Cloudkart.ai
Liner logo

Liner

Freemium

An AI research and search assistant with a web, PDF and YouTube highlighter. Ask a question and it returns cited answers, then lets you save and organise sources into collections. Free tier plus Pro around $15-18/month; it draws on models like GPT and Claude.

ai searchresearch assistantweb highlightercitationsknowledge management
Visit Liner

Work at Liner? Manage this listing

Our take

Liner is an AI research and search assistant with a handy web/PDF/YouTube highlighter - ask a question and it returns cited answers, then lets you save and organise sources into collections. Free tier plus Pro around $15-18/month. It draws on models like GPT and Claude. Search and research tools are crowded (Perplexity, You.com, Elicit); the highlighting and source management set it apart.

Best for

Students, researchers and knowledge workers who want cited AI answers plus a way to highlight, save and organise sources across the web.

Pros

  • Cited AI answers backed by models like GPT and Claude
  • Highlighter works across web pages, PDFs and YouTube
  • Saves and organises findings into tagged collections
  • Easy to start - browser extension plus web app, with a free tier

Cons

  • Answer quality varies and still needs fact-checking
  • Crowded space - overlaps with Perplexity, You.com and Elicit
  • Heaviest AI-agent usage is gated to higher-priced tiers

How it compares

Against Perplexity and You.com, Liner's differentiator is research workflow - highlighting across sources and organising them into collections, not just returning an answer.

Full review

Liner is an AI search and research assistant wrapped around a highlighter. Ask a question and it returns an answer with citations, drawing on models such as GPT and Claude; the part that sets it apart is the ability to highlight passages across web pages, PDFs and even YouTube, then file everything into tagged collections you can come back to.

There is a free tier with daily limits, and paid plans land around $15-18/month, with higher tiers unlocking more AI-agent usage. It is a genuinely useful workflow for literature reviews and deep reading, but it sits in a crowded field next to Perplexity, You.com and Elicit, and like all of them its answers are a starting point that still needs checking against the underlying sources.

Cloudkart Trust Graph

3.8/5
  • Actual Utility4/5

    Source: Initial LLM-authored rubric (backfill)

  • Ease of Use5/5

    Source: Initial LLM-authored rubric (backfill)

  • Pricing Fairness4/5

    Source: Initial LLM-authored rubric (backfill)

  • Reliability3/5

    Source: Initial LLM-authored rubric (backfill)

  • Differentiation3/5

    Source: Initial LLM-authored rubric (backfill)

Scored as of . Each score is versioned and auditable; vendors cannot buy it.

How this score is set

Editorial rubric
Primary signal — five dimensions, 3.8/5 average.
Community reviews
None yet.
Pricing verified
Not yet verified
Independence
Score set by our editorial team before any affiliate relationship is considered. No vendor can buy it.

How we keep this independent →

Frequently asked questions

Is Liner free, and how much does it cost?
Liner has a free tier, with paid plans that unlock advanced features.
Who is Liner best for?
Students, researchers and knowledge workers who want cited AI answers plus a way to highlight, save and organise sources across the web.
How is Liner rated on Cloudkart.ai?
Liner scores 3.8 out of 5 on the Cloudkart.ai rubric, which weighs actual utility, ease of use, pricing fairness, reliability and differentiation. Scores are set editorially and can never be bought.

Community reviews

No community reviews yet. Be the first to share how Liner works for you.

Relevant tools

More tools in Data & Analytics AI.

Compare Liner head-to-head: vs Streamlit · vs Langfuse · vs Metabase · vs Lightdash